According to @godofprompt on Twitter, in a direct comparison between Gemini 3.0 Pro, ChatGPT 5.1, and Claude Opus 4.5 using the prompt to create a JavaScript animation of a double or triple pendulum with adjustable mass and length, only Claude Opus 4.5 delivered a fully correct, physics-accurate solution (source: twitter.com/godofprompt/status/1995480554037227809). This showcases the growing gap in AI model proficiency for complex code generation tasks, highlighting Claude Opus 4.5 as a leader in generative AI for realistic physics simulations and advanced programming use cases. Such benchmarks are increasingly valuable for businesses evaluating AI coding assistants for software development, scientific research, and education, where solution accuracy and advanced technical understanding are critical.

According to @godofprompt, a direct comparison was conducted between Gemini 3 Pro, ChatGPT 5.1, and Claude Opus 4.5 in response to a complex prompt requiring HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code for simulating 20 colored balls with gravity and collision inside a spinning heptagon. This test highlights the AI models' capabilities in advanced coding, real-time physics calculations, and creative problem-solving. The results demonstrate each model's proficiency in generating integrated front-end code, handling geometric physics, and providing efficient collision detection algorithms, which are critical for developing interactive AI-driven web applications. Such benchmarking offers valuable business insights for companies seeking the most capable AI solutions for technical development tasks (Source: @godofprompt, Nov 30, 2025).